Polynesia vs Republic of Moldova: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Polynesia
24.58 1000 No
in 2025
Republic of Moldova
866.9 1000 No
in 2025
Polynesia rank
18th
Republic of Moldova rank
16th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Polynesia
  • Republic of Moldova
02505007501.0k199120082025

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 866.9 1000 No against 24.58 1000 No in Polynesia, a difference of 842.32 1000 No.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 35.3 times Polynesia's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.

Polynesia ranks 18th and Republic of Moldova ranks 16th of 20 countries.

Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Polynesia Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 35.1 1000 No 750.1 1000 No 715 1000 No Republic of Moldova
2000s 34.41 1000 No 873.84 1000 No 839.44 1000 No Republic of Moldova
2010s 33.33 1000 No 1,034 1000 No 1,000 1000 No Republic of Moldova
2020s 27 1000 No 919.28 1000 No 892.28 1000 No Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Polynesia or Republic of Moldova?
Republic of Moldova, at 866.9 1000 No against 24.58 1000 No in Polynesia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Polynesia and Republic of Moldova?
842.32 1000 No, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Republic of Moldova?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Polynesia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Polynesia ranks 18th and Republic of Moldova ranks 16th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Polynesia vs Republic of Moldova: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/polynesia/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/polynesia/republic-of-moldova/">Polynesia vs Republic of Moldova: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 7,893 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.