North Macedonia vs Palestine: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

North Macedonia
58.66 1000 No
in 2025
Palestine
70.16 1000 No
in 2022
North Macedonia rank
149th
Palestine rank
146th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Palestine
5075100125150199120082025

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 70.16 1000 No against 58.66 1000 No in North Macedonia, a difference of 11.5 1000 No.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 149th and Palestine ranks 146th of 194 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 135.73 1000 No 66.97 1000 No 68.76 1000 No North Macedonia
2000s 115.43 1000 No 86.67 1000 No 28.77 1000 No North Macedonia
2010s 107.72 1000 No 80.42 1000 No 27.3 1000 No North Macedonia
2020s 72.35 1000 No 66.34 1000 No 6.01 1000 No North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, North Macedonia or Palestine?
Palestine, at 70.16 1000 No against 58.66 1000 No in North Macedonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between North Macedonia and Palestine?
11.5 1000 No, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Palestine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do North Macedonia and Palestine rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
North Macedonia ranks 149th and Palestine ranks 146th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Palestine: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/north-macedonia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/north-macedonia/west-bank-and-gaza/">North Macedonia vs Palestine: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.