Nicaragua vs South Africa: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

Nicaragua
929.72 1000 No
in 2022
South Africa
977.23 1000 No
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
78th
South Africa rank
75th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • Nicaragua
  • South Africa
4006008001.0k1.2k1.4k199120082025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 977.23 1000 No against 929.72 1000 No in Nicaragua, a difference of 47.51 1000 No.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was South Africa ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 78th and South Africa ranks 75th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 489.59 1000 No 1,150 1000 No 660.47 1000 No South Africa
2000s 659.99 1000 No 1,026 1000 No 365.86 1000 No South Africa
2010s 793.35 1000 No 806.1 1000 No 12.75 1000 No South Africa
2020s 901.91 1000 No 885.24 1000 No 16.68 1000 No Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Nicaragua or South Africa?
South Africa, at 977.23 1000 No against 929.72 1000 No in Nicaragua as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Nicaragua and South Africa?
47.51 1000 No, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and South Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do Nicaragua and South Africa rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Nicaragua ranks 78th and South Africa ranks 75th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs South Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/nicaragua/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/nicaragua/south-africa/">Nicaragua vs South Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.