Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

Mauritius
28.21 1000 No
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
31.29 1000 No
in 2025
Mauritius rank
164th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
162nd

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • Mauritius
  • Trinidad and Tobago
20406080199120082025

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 31.29 1000 No against 28.21 1000 No in Mauritius, a difference of 3.08 1000 No.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 164th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 162nd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 79.33 1000 No 61.66 1000 No 17.67 1000 No Mauritius
2000s 55.03 1000 No 44.19 1000 No 10.84 1000 No Mauritius
2010s 39.13 1000 No 33.6 1000 No 5.52 1000 No Mauritius
2020s 29.29 1000 No 33.46 1000 No 4.17 1000 No Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Mauritius or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 31.29 1000 No against 28.21 1000 No in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago?
3.08 1000 No, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Mauritius ranks 164th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/mauritius/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/mauritius/trinidad-and-tobago/">Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.