El Salvador vs Equatorial Guinea: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

El Salvador
400.43 1000 No
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
374.24 1000 No
in 2025
El Salvador rank
105th
Equatorial Guinea rank
106th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • El Salvador
  • Equatorial Guinea
200400600199120082025

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 400.43 1000 No against 374.24 1000 No in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 26.19 1000 No.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 105th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 106th of 194 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 556.82 1000 No 128.19 1000 No 428.63 1000 No El Salvador
2000s 437.38 1000 No 175.07 1000 No 262.31 1000 No El Salvador
2010s 472.54 1000 No 273.55 1000 No 198.99 1000 No El Salvador
2020s 398.35 1000 No 346.28 1000 No 52.07 1000 No El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, El Salvador or Equatorial Guinea?
El Salvador, at 400.43 1000 No against 374.24 1000 No in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between El Salvador and Equatorial Guinea?
26.19 1000 No, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Equatorial Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
El Salvador ranks 105th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 106th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Equatorial Guinea: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/el-salvador/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/el-salvador/equatorial-guinea/">El Salvador vs Equatorial Guinea: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.