China, Taiwan Province of vs Serbia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

China, Taiwan Province of
523.49 1000 No
in 2025
Serbia
567.93 1000 No
in 2025
China, Taiwan Province of rank
81st
Serbia rank
78th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Serbia
05001.0k1.5k199120082025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 567.93 1000 No against 523.49 1000 No in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 44.44 1000 No.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times China, Taiwan Province of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Serbia ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 175 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 855.55 1000 No 1,227 1000 No 371.48 1000 No Serbia
2000s 669.95 1000 No 981.35 1000 No 311.4 1000 No Serbia
2010s 585.6 1000 No 648.81 1000 No 63.21 1000 No Serbia
2020s 551.76 1000 No 571.43 1000 No 19.67 1000 No Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, China, Taiwan Province of or Serbia?
Serbia, at 567.93 1000 No against 523.49 1000 No in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between China, Taiwan Province of and Serbia?
44.44 1000 No, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Serbia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Serbia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Serbia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/china-taiwan-province-of/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/china-taiwan-province-of/serbia/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Serbia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 7,893 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.