Botswana vs New Zealand: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

Botswana
163.3 1000 No
in 2025
New Zealand
156.06 1000 No
in 2025
Botswana rank
129th
New Zealand rank
130th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • Botswana
  • New Zealand
50100150199120082025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 163.3 1000 No against 156.06 1000 No in New Zealand, a difference of 7.24 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Botswana ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 130th of 194 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 54.97 1000 No 162.32 1000 No 107.35 1000 No New Zealand
2000s 100.44 1000 No 156.94 1000 No 56.51 1000 No New Zealand
2010s 119.69 1000 No 153.28 1000 No 33.59 1000 No New Zealand
2020s 152.75 1000 No 164.16 1000 No 11.41 1000 No New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Botswana or New Zealand?
Botswana, at 163.3 1000 No against 156.06 1000 No in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Botswana and New Zealand?
7.24 1000 No, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Botswana and New Zealand rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Botswana ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 130th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs New Zealand: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/botswana/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/botswana/new-zealand/">Botswana vs New Zealand: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.