Bhutan vs Solomon Islands: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

Bhutan
168.63 1000 No
in 2025
Solomon Islands
187.74 1000 No
in 2025
Bhutan rank
127th
Solomon Islands rank
125th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • Bhutan
  • Solomon Islands
50100150200199120082025

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 187.74 1000 No against 168.63 1000 No in Bhutan, a difference of 19.11 1000 No.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 127th and Solomon Islands ranks 125th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 151.54 1000 No 57.53 1000 No 94.01 1000 No Bhutan
2000s 181.61 1000 No 90.31 1000 No 91.3 1000 No Bhutan
2010s 190.31 1000 No 129.88 1000 No 60.43 1000 No Bhutan
2020s 175.66 1000 No 176.69 1000 No 1.03 1000 No Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Bhutan or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 187.74 1000 No against 168.63 1000 No in Bhutan as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Bhutan and Solomon Islands?
19.11 1000 No, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Solomon Islands?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Solomon Islands rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Bhutan ranks 127th and Solomon Islands ranks 125th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Solomon Islands: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/bhutan/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/bhutan/solomon-islands/">Bhutan vs Solomon Islands: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.