Australia vs Mauritania: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

Australia
308.36 1000 No
in 2025
Mauritania
359.68 1000 No
in 2025
Australia rank
112th
Mauritania rank
109th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • Australia
  • Mauritania
0100200300400500199120082025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 359.68 1000 No against 308.36 1000 No in Australia, a difference of 51.32 1000 No.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 112th and Mauritania ranks 109th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s 452.55 1000 No 246.96 1000 No 205.59 1000 No Australia
2000s 419.34 1000 No 284.43 1000 No 134.91 1000 No Australia
2010s 336.48 1000 No 304.79 1000 No 31.69 1000 No Australia
2020s 318.59 1000 No 347.38 1000 No 28.78 1000 No Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Australia or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 359.68 1000 No against 308.36 1000 No in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Australia and Mauritania?
51.32 1000 No, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritania?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Australia and Mauritania rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Australia ranks 112th and Mauritania ranks 109th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Mauritania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/australia/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/australia/mauritania/">Australia vs Mauritania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.