Australia and New Zealand vs Guinea-Bissau: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

Australia and New Zealand
464.42 1000 No
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
534.5 1000 No
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
96th
Guinea-Bissau rank
94th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Guinea-Bissau
0200400600199120082025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 534.5 1000 No against 464.42 1000 No in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 70.08 1000 No.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 96th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 614.87 1000 No 257.29 1000 No 357.58 1000 No Australia and New Zealand
2000s 576.28 1000 No 317.18 1000 No 259.1 1000 No Australia and New Zealand
2010s 489.75 1000 No 407.69 1000 No 82.07 1000 No Australia and New Zealand
2020s 482.75 1000 No 506.27 1000 No 23.51 1000 No Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Australia and New Zealand or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 534.5 1000 No against 464.42 1000 No in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Australia and New Zealand and Guinea-Bissau?
70.08 1000 No, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Guinea-Bissau?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 96th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Guinea-Bissau: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/australia-and-new-zealand/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/australia-and-new-zealand/guinea-bissau/">Australia and New Zealand vs Guinea-Bissau: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.