Africa vs China, mainland: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Africa
263,328 1000 No
in 2025
China, mainland
159,883 1000 No
in 2025
Africa rank
4th
China, mainland rank
3rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Africa
  • China, mainland
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199120082025

How they compare

Africa currently reports 263,328 1000 No against 159,883 1000 No in China, mainland, a difference of 103,445 1000 No.

That makes Africa's figure about 1.6 times China, mainland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was China, mainland ahead.

Africa ranks 4th and China, mainland ranks 3rd of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Africa averaged higher in 1 and China, mainland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa China, mainland Difference Ahead
1990s 147,766 1000 No 352,985 1000 No 205,220 1000 No China, mainland
2000s 186,101 1000 No 323,377 1000 No 137,276 1000 No China, mainland
2010s 217,004 1000 No 224,598 1000 No 7,594 1000 No China, mainland
2020s 249,909 1000 No 169,358 1000 No 80,551 1000 No Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Africa or China, mainland?
Africa, at 263,328 1000 No against 159,883 1000 No in China, mainland as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Africa and China, mainland?
103,445 1000 No, with Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and China, mainland?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Africa and China, mainland rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Africa ranks 4th and China, mainland ranks 3rd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa vs China, mainland: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/africa/china-mainland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/africa/china-mainland/">Africa vs China, mainland: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 7,893 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.