How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zambia?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Poland vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Poland

0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Poland rank

74th

Zambia rank

73rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Poland
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 74th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 164 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Poland	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0117 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0093 1000 No per square kilometre	Poland
2000s	0.0084 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0051 1000 No per square kilometre	Poland
2010s	0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre	Poland
2020s	0.0054 1000 No per square kilometre	0.005 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre	Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Poland or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Poland and Zambia?: 0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zambia?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Poland and Zambia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Poland ranks 74th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/poland/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/poland/zambia/">Poland vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.