How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sweden?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs Sweden: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Namibia

0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Sweden

0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia rank

151st

Sweden rank

153rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Namibia
Sweden

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.

Namibia ranks 151st and Sweden ranks 153rd of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Sweden
2020s	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Namibia or Sweden?: Namibia, at 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Namibia and Sweden?: 0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sweden?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Sweden rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Namibia ranks 151st and Sweden ranks 153rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sweden: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/namibia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/namibia/sweden/">Namibia vs Sweden: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.