How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Rwanda?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Maldives vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Maldives

0.1031 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

0.1019 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Maldives rank

3rd

Rwanda rank

4th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Maldives
Rwanda

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 0.1031 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1019 1000 No per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.

Maldives ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 4th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Maldives	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0585 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0671 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0086 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	0.0569 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0805 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0237 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0652 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0805 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0153 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.1013 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0948 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre	Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Maldives or Rwanda?: Maldives, at 0.1031 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1019 1000 No per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Maldives and Rwanda?: 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Rwanda?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Rwanda rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Maldives ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 4th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/maldives/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/maldives/rwanda/">Maldives vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.