How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Hungary?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guam vs Hungary: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Guam

0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Hungary

0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Guam rank

103rd

Hungary rank

100th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Guam
Hungary

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre in Guam, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Guam ahead.

Guam ranks 103rd and Hungary ranks 100th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 3 and Hungary in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guam	Hungary	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre	0.001 1000 No per square kilometre	Guam
2000s	0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre	0.001 1000 No per square kilometre	Guam
2010s	0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	Guam
2020s	0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Guam or Hungary?: Hungary, at 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre in Guam as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Guam and Hungary?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Hungary?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Guam and Hungary rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Guam ranks 103rd and Hungary ranks 100th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Hungary: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/guam/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/guam/hungary/">Guam vs Hungary: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.