Greece vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Greece
0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Greece rank
88th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
85th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Greece
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.0020.0040.006199120072023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre in Greece, a difference of 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Greece's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 85th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0058 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre Greece
2000s 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre Greece
2010s 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre Greece
2020s 0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Greece or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre in Greece as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Greece and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Sao Tome and Principe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Greece and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Greece ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 85th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greece vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/greece/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/greece/sao-tome-and-principe/">Greece vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.