Georgia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Georgia
0.0087 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0084 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
49th
Zimbabwe rank
51st

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Georgia
  • Zimbabwe
0.0050.010.0150.02199120072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0087 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0084 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 164 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0181 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0134 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0151 1000 No per square kilometre 0.007 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0115 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0082 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0092 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
Georgia, at 0.0087 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0084 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Georgia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/georgia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/georgia/zimbabwe/">Georgia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.