How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Guatemala?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Guatemala: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Gambia

0.0204 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Guatemala

0.0199 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Gambia rank

21st

Guatemala rank

23rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Gambia
Guatemala

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0204 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0199 1000 No per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Guatemala ahead.

Gambia ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 23rd of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Guatemala	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0094 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0124 1000 No per square kilometre	0.003 1000 No per square kilometre	Guatemala
2000s	0.012 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0154 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre	Guatemala
2010s	0.0163 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0178 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre	Guatemala
2020s	0.0199 1000 No per square kilometre	0.019 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Gambia or Guatemala?: Gambia, at 0.0204 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0199 1000 No per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Gambia and Guatemala?: 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Guatemala?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Guatemala rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Gambia ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 23rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Guatemala: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/gambia-the/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/gambia-the/guatemala/">Gambia vs Guatemala: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.