How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Namibia?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Finland vs Namibia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Finland

0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Finland rank

149th

Namibia rank

151st

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Finland
Namibia

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 151st of 164 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Finland	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre	Finland
2000s	0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	Finland
2010s	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Finland
2020s	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Finland or Namibia?: Finland, at 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Finland and Namibia?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Namibia?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Finland and Namibia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Finland ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 151st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Namibia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/finland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/finland/namibia/">Finland vs Namibia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.