Central African Republic vs Ireland: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Central African Republic
0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
111th
Ireland rank
114th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Ireland
00.0010.0020.003199120072023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ireland ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 111th and Ireland ranks 114th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Ireland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Central African Republic or Ireland?
Central African Republic, at 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Central African Republic and Ireland?
0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ireland?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Ireland rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Central African Republic ranks 111th and Ireland ranks 114th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Ireland: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/central-african-republic/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/central-african-republic/ireland/">Central African Republic vs Ireland: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.