How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Rwanda?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Burundi

0.1946 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

0.1019 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Burundi rank

2nd

Rwanda rank

4th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Burundi
Rwanda

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.1946 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1019 1000 No per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0927 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.9 times Rwanda's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 4th of 164 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0902 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0671 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0231 1000 No per square kilometre	Burundi
2000s	0.11 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0805 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0295 1000 No per square kilometre	Burundi
2010s	0.1521 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0805 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0716 1000 No per square kilometre	Burundi
2020s	0.1841 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0948 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0893 1000 No per square kilometre	Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Burundi or Rwanda?: Burundi, at 0.1946 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1019 1000 No per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Burundi and Rwanda?: 0.0927 1000 No per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Rwanda?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Rwanda rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Burundi ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 4th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/burundi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/burundi/rwanda/">Burundi vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.