How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jordan?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Jordan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Brazil

0.001 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Jordan

0.001 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Brazil rank

134th

Jordan rank

132nd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Brazil
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 134th and Jordan ranks 132nd of 164 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	Brazil
2000s	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	Brazil
2010s	0.001 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	Brazil
2020s	0.001 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Brazil or Jordan?: Jordan, at 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Brazil and Jordan?: 0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jordan?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Jordan rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Brazil ranks 134th and Jordan ranks 132nd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Jordan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/brazil/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/brazil/jordan/">Brazil vs Jordan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.