How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Eswatini: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Belarus

0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Eswatini

0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

101st

Eswatini rank

99th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Belarus
Eswatini

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 101st and Eswatini ranks 99th of 164 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Belarus or Eswatini?: Eswatini, at 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Belarus and Eswatini?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Belarus ranks 101st and Eswatini ranks 99th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Eswatini: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/belarus/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/belarus/eswatini/">Belarus vs Eswatini: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.