Belarus vs Congo: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Belarus
0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
101st
Congo rank
104th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Belarus
  • Congo
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.005199120072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 101st and Congo ranks 104th of 164 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Belarus or Congo?
Belarus, at 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Belarus and Congo?
0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Congo rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Belarus ranks 101st and Congo ranks 104th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Congo: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/belarus/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/belarus/congo-rep/">Belarus vs Congo: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.