How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Gambia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Azerbaijan vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Azerbaijan

0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Gambia

0.0204 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Azerbaijan rank

20th

Gambia rank

21st

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Azerbaijan
Gambia

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0204 1000 No per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 20th and Gambia ranks 21st of 164 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Azerbaijan	Gambia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.02 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0096 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0104 1000 No per square kilometre	Azerbaijan
2000s	0.0187 1000 No per square kilometre	0.012 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0068 1000 No per square kilometre	Azerbaijan
2010s	0.0199 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0163 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre	Azerbaijan
2020s	0.0208 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0199 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Azerbaijan or Gambia?: Azerbaijan, at 0.0207 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0204 1000 No per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Azerbaijan and Gambia?: 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Gambia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Gambia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Azerbaijan ranks 20th and Gambia ranks 21st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/azerbaijan/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/azerbaijan/gambia-the/">Azerbaijan vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.