Afghanistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Afghanistan
0.006 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
66th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
65th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013199120072023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.006 1000 No per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 66th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 65th of 164 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre 0.012 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0059 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Afghanistan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.006 1000 No per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Afghanistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Afghanistan ranks 66th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 65th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/afghanistan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value-per-3/afghanistan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Afghanistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.