Sierra Leone vs South Africa: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male

Sierra Leone
649.03 1000 No
in 2025
South Africa
665.1 1000 No
in 2025
Sierra Leone rank
76th
South Africa rank
74th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • South Africa
02004006008001.0k199120082025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 665.1 1000 No against 649.03 1000 No in Sierra Leone, a difference of 16.07 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was South Africa ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 76th and South Africa ranks 74th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 441.99 1000 No 801.31 1000 No 359.32 1000 No South Africa
2000s 586.54 1000 No 694.48 1000 No 107.94 1000 No South Africa
2010s 618.06 1000 No 542.61 1000 No 75.45 1000 No Sierra Leone
2020s 628.44 1000 No 636.12 1000 No 7.68 1000 No South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Sierra Leone or South Africa?
South Africa, at 665.1 1000 No against 649.03 1000 No in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Sierra Leone and South Africa?
16.07 1000 No, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Sierra Leone and South Africa rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Sierra Leone ranks 76th and South Africa ranks 74th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs South Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/sierra-leone/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/sierra-leone/south-africa/">Sierra Leone vs South Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.