Republic of Moldova vs Tunisia: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male

Republic of Moldova
377.84 1000 No
in 2025
Tunisia
366.07 1000 No
in 2025
Republic of Moldova rank
93rd
Tunisia rank
94th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Tunisia
0200400600199120082025

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 377.84 1000 No against 366.07 1000 No in Tunisia, a difference of 11.77 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tunisia ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 94th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 372.28 1000 No 412.13 1000 No 39.85 1000 No Tunisia
2000s 399 1000 No 430.86 1000 No 31.87 1000 No Tunisia
2010s 466.51 1000 No 427.87 1000 No 38.65 1000 No Republic of Moldova
2020s 406.38 1000 No 356.4 1000 No 49.97 1000 No Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Republic of Moldova or Tunisia?
Republic of Moldova, at 377.84 1000 No against 366.07 1000 No in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Republic of Moldova and Tunisia?
11.77 1000 No, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Tunisia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Republic of Moldova and Tunisia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Republic of Moldova ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 94th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Tunisia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/republic-of-moldova/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/republic-of-moldova/tunisia/">Republic of Moldova vs Tunisia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.