Papua New Guinea vs Sierra Leone: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male

Papua New Guinea
665.05 1000 No
in 2025
Sierra Leone
649.03 1000 No
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
75th
Sierra Leone rank
76th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Sierra Leone
200300400500600700199120082025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 665.05 1000 No against 649.03 1000 No in Sierra Leone, a difference of 16.02 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 75th and Sierra Leone ranks 76th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 227.69 1000 No 441.99 1000 No 214.31 1000 No Sierra Leone
2000s 324.06 1000 No 586.54 1000 No 262.47 1000 No Sierra Leone
2010s 447.38 1000 No 618.06 1000 No 170.68 1000 No Sierra Leone
2020s 641.41 1000 No 628.44 1000 No 12.97 1000 No Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Papua New Guinea or Sierra Leone?
Papua New Guinea, at 665.05 1000 No against 649.03 1000 No in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone?
16.02 1000 No, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Papua New Guinea ranks 75th and Sierra Leone ranks 76th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Sierra Leone: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/papua-new-guinea/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/papua-new-guinea/sierra-leone/">Papua New Guinea vs Sierra Leone: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.