Mauritania vs Turkmenistan: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male

Mauritania
254.86 1000 No
in 2025
Turkmenistan
241.87 1000 No
in 2025
Mauritania rank
104th
Turkmenistan rank
106th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male over time

  • Mauritania
  • Turkmenistan
0100200300199120082025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 254.86 1000 No against 241.87 1000 No in Turkmenistan, a difference of 12.99 1000 No.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Mauritania ranks 104th and Turkmenistan ranks 106th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 179.64 1000 No 254.15 1000 No 74.52 1000 No Turkmenistan
2000s 201.57 1000 No 284.34 1000 No 82.76 1000 No Turkmenistan
2010s 214.43 1000 No 255.13 1000 No 40.71 1000 No Turkmenistan
2020s 246.01 1000 No 237.95 1000 No 8.06 1000 No Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Mauritania or Turkmenistan?
Mauritania, at 254.86 1000 No against 241.87 1000 No in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Mauritania and Turkmenistan?
12.99 1000 No, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Turkmenistan?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Turkmenistan rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Mauritania ranks 104th and Turkmenistan ranks 106th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Turkmenistan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/mauritania/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/mauritania/turkmenistan/">Mauritania vs Turkmenistan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.