Dominican Republic vs Tunisia: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male

Dominican Republic
339.4 1000 No
in 2025
Tunisia
366.07 1000 No
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
96th
Tunisia rank
94th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Tunisia
0100200300400500199120082025

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 366.07 1000 No against 339.4 1000 No in Dominican Republic, a difference of 26.67 1000 No.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 426.61 1000 No 412.13 1000 No 14.48 1000 No Dominican Republic
2000s 397.14 1000 No 430.86 1000 No 33.73 1000 No Tunisia
2010s 392.6 1000 No 427.87 1000 No 35.27 1000 No Tunisia
2020s 351.68 1000 No 356.4 1000 No 4.72 1000 No Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Dominican Republic or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 366.07 1000 No against 339.4 1000 No in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Dominican Republic and Tunisia?
26.67 1000 No, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Tunisia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Dominican Republic and Tunisia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Dominican Republic ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Tunisia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/dominican-republic/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/dominican-republic/tunisia/">Dominican Republic vs Tunisia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.