Dominican Republic vs Serbia: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male

Dominican Republic
339.4 1000 No
in 2025
Serbia
311.13 1000 No
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
96th
Serbia rank
99th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Male over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Serbia
0200400600199120082025

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 339.4 1000 No against 311.13 1000 No in Serbia, a difference of 28.27 1000 No.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Serbia ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 96th and Serbia ranks 99th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 426.61 1000 No 622.86 1000 No 196.25 1000 No Serbia
2000s 397.14 1000 No 499.76 1000 No 102.62 1000 No Serbia
2010s 392.6 1000 No 365.33 1000 No 27.27 1000 No Dominican Republic
2020s 351.68 1000 No 316.7 1000 No 34.98 1000 No Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
Dominican Republic, at 339.4 1000 No against 311.13 1000 No in Serbia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
28.27 1000 No, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Dominican Republic ranks 96th and Serbia ranks 99th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Serbia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/dominican-republic/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value/dominican-republic/serbia/">Dominican Republic vs Serbia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.