Malawi vs United Republic of Tanzania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Malawi
2.53 % change on previous year
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
2.29 % change on previous year
in 2025
Malawi rank
19th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
22nd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Malawi
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-5051015199220082025

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2.53 % change on previous year against 2.29 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.24 % change on previous year.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 19th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 22nd of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 1.1 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year 1.84 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 1.58 % change on previous year 2.07 % change on previous year 0.4924 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0.9315 % change on previous year 2.78 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 3.95 % change on previous year 3.09 % change on previous year 0.8559 % change on previous year Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Malawi or United Republic of Tanzania?
Malawi, at 2.53 % change on previous year against 2.29 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Malawi and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.24 % change on previous year, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Malawi and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Malawi ranks 19th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 22nd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs United Republic of Tanzania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-5/malawi/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-5/malawi/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Malawi vs United Republic of Tanzania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 7,667 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.