How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Uganda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Rwanda

0.0455 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Uganda

0.0334 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda rank

6th

Uganda rank

7th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Rwanda
Uganda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0455 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0334 1000 No per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0121 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Uganda's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 6th and Uganda ranks 7th of 164 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0354 1000 No per square kilometre	0.011 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0244 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	0.0383 1000 No per square kilometre	0.015 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0233 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0355 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0228 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0127 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.0425 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0312 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0113 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Rwanda or Uganda?: Rwanda, at 0.0455 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0334 1000 No per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Rwanda and Uganda?: 0.0121 1000 No per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Uganda rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Rwanda ranks 6th and Uganda ranks 7th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Uganda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/rwanda/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/rwanda/uganda/">Rwanda vs Uganda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.