How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zambia?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Romania vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Romania

0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Romania rank

81st

Zambia rank

83rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Romania
Zambia

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Romania ranks 81st and Zambia ranks 83rd of 164 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Romania	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0054 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania
2000s	0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania
2010s	0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre	0.002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania
2020s	0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Romania or Zambia?: Romania, at 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Romania and Zambia?: 0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zambia?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Romania and Zambia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Romania ranks 81st and Zambia ranks 83rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/romania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/romania/zambia/">Romania vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.