Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Malaysia
0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Malaysia
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0020.0030.004199120072023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 164 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.004 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
Malaysia, at 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Malaysia ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/malaysia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/malaysia/zimbabwe/">Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.