How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Uruguay: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Latvia

0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

135th

Uruguay rank

134th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Latvia
Uruguay

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 135th and Uruguay ranks 134th of 164 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Latvia or Uruguay?: Uruguay, at 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Latvia and Uruguay?: 0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Latvia ranks 135th and Uruguay ranks 134th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Uruguay: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/latvia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/latvia/uruguay/">Latvia vs Uruguay: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.