Georgia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Georgia
0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
65th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Georgia
  • Zimbabwe
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01199120072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 164 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0083 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0071 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre 0.004 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0055 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
Georgia, at 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Georgia ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/georgia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/georgia/zimbabwe/">Georgia vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.