How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Iraq?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Iraq: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Eswatini

0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Iraq

0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Eswatini rank

102nd

Iraq rank

104th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Eswatini
Iraq

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 102nd and Iraq ranks 104th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Iraq	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Iraq
2000s	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Eswatini
2010s	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Iraq
2020s	0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Eswatini or Iraq?: Eswatini, at 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Eswatini and Iraq?: 0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Iraq?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Iraq rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Eswatini ranks 102nd and Iraq ranks 104th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Iraq: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/eswatini/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/eswatini/iraq/">Eswatini vs Iraq: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.