How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Senegal?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Senegal: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Ecuador

0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Senegal

0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador rank

46th

Senegal rank

45th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Ecuador
Senegal

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Senegal ahead.

Ecuador ranks 46th and Senegal ranks 45th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Senegal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Senegal	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0043 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	Senegal
2000s	0.0051 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	0.0056 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0043 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	Ecuador
2020s	0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0057 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Ecuador or Senegal?: Senegal, at 0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Ecuador and Senegal?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Senegal?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Senegal rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Ecuador ranks 46th and Senegal ranks 45th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Senegal: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/ecuador/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/ecuador/senegal/">Ecuador vs Senegal: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.