How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Gambia?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Ecuador

0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Gambia

0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador rank

46th

Gambia rank

44th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Ecuador
Gambia

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Gambia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 46th and Gambia ranks 44th of 164 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Gambia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	Gambia
2000s	0.0051 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0052 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	Gambia
2010s	0.0056 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	Gambia
2020s	0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Ecuador or Gambia?: Gambia, at 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Ecuador and Gambia?: 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Gambia?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Gambia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Ecuador ranks 46th and Gambia ranks 44th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/ecuador/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/ecuador/gambia-the/">Ecuador vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.