Dominican Republic vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Dominican Republic
0.0071 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
42nd
Gambia rank
44th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Gambia
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01199120072023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.0071 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.

Dominican Republic ranks 42nd and Gambia ranks 44th of 164 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0088 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 0.0082 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0052 1000 No per square kilometre 0.003 1000 No per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 0.0081 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 0.0074 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Dominican Republic or Gambia?
Dominican Republic, at 0.0071 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Dominican Republic and Gambia?
0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Gambia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Gambia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Dominican Republic ranks 42nd and Gambia ranks 44th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/dominican-republic/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/dominican-republic/gambia-the/">Dominican Republic vs Gambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.