How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Samoa?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs Samoa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Costa Rica

0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Samoa

0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Costa Rica rank

63rd

Samoa rank

62nd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Costa Rica
Samoa

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Samoa ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Samoa ranks 62nd of 164 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	Samoa	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre	Samoa
2000s	0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0051 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	Samoa
2010s	0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	Samoa
2020s	0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Costa Rica or Samoa?: Samoa, at 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Costa Rica and Samoa?: 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Samoa?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Samoa rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Samoa ranks 62nd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Samoa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/costa-rica/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/costa-rica/samoa/">Costa Rica vs Samoa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.