How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kuwait?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Kuwait: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Barbados

0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Kuwait

0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Barbados rank

76th

Kuwait rank

78th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Barbados
Kuwait

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre in Kuwait, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 76th and Kuwait ranks 78th of 164 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Kuwait	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0089 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	0.008 1000 No per square kilometre	Barbados
2000s	0.0079 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre	Barbados
2010s	0.007 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre	Barbados
2020s	0.0055 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0028 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Barbados or Kuwait?: Barbados, at 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre in Kuwait as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Barbados and Kuwait?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kuwait?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Kuwait rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Barbados ranks 76th and Kuwait ranks 78th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Kuwait: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/barbados/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/barbados/kuwait/">Barbados vs Kuwait: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.