Bahamas vs Botswana: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Bahamas
0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
153rd
Botswana rank
150th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Bahamas
  • Botswana
0000.0010.001199120072023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.4 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 153rd and Botswana ranks 150th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre 0 1000 No per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Bahamas or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Bahamas and Botswana?
0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Botswana?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Botswana rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Bahamas ranks 153rd and Botswana ranks 150th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Botswana: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/bahamas-the/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/bahamas-the/botswana/">Bahamas vs Botswana: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.