How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Congo: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Austria

0.001 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo

0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Austria rank

122nd

Congo rank

121st

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Austria
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 122nd and Congo ranks 121st of 164 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre	0.001 1000 No per square kilometre	Austria
2000s	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	Austria
2010s	0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre	Austria
2020s	0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre	0.001 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Austria or Congo?: Congo, at 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Austria and Congo?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Austria and Congo rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Austria ranks 122nd and Congo ranks 121st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Congo: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/austria/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/austria/congo-rep/">Austria vs Congo: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.