How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zambia?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Angola

0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Angola rank

84th

Zambia rank

83rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Angola
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zambia ahead.

Angola ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 83rd of 164 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre	Zambia
2000s	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre	Zambia
2010s	0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre	0.002 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre	Zambia
2020s	0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Angola or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Angola and Zambia?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zambia?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Angola and Zambia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Angola ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 83rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/angola/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/angola/zambia/">Angola vs Zambia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.