How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Romania?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Romania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Angola

0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Romania

0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Angola rank

84th

Romania rank

81st

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Angola
Romania

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 84th and Romania ranks 81st of 164 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Romania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre	0.006 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania
2000s	0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0053 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania
2010s	0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania
2020s	0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre	Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Angola or Romania?: Romania, at 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Angola and Romania?: 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Romania?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Angola and Romania rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Angola ranks 84th and Romania ranks 81st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Romania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/angola/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-4/angola/romania/">Angola vs Romania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.