North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

North Macedonia
0 1000 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
0 1000 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
106th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
103rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00000199120082025

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 106th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 103rd of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2000s 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, North Macedonia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
North Macedonia ranks 106th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 103rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-3/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-male-value-3/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/">North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 No per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,701 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.