Romania vs Turkmenistan: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Romania
275.97 1000 No
in 2025
Turkmenistan
220.61 1000 No
in 2025
Romania rank
80th
Turkmenistan rank
82nd

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Romania
  • Turkmenistan
2004006008001.0k1.2k199120082025

How they compare

Romania currently reports 275.97 1000 No against 220.61 1000 No in Turkmenistan, a difference of 55.36 1000 No.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.3 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Romania ranks 80th and Turkmenistan ranks 82nd of 194 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 1,076 1000 No 252.57 1000 No 823.61 1000 No Romania
2000s 773.18 1000 No 272.12 1000 No 501.06 1000 No Romania
2010s 483.44 1000 No 229.03 1000 No 254.41 1000 No Romania
2020s 302.44 1000 No 218.22 1000 No 84.23 1000 No Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Romania or Turkmenistan?
Romania, at 275.97 1000 No against 220.61 1000 No in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Romania and Turkmenistan?
55.36 1000 No, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Turkmenistan?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Romania and Turkmenistan rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Romania ranks 80th and Turkmenistan ranks 82nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Turkmenistan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/romania/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/romania/turkmenistan/">Romania vs Turkmenistan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.